Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dan Added vs Naoki Tajima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Added vs Tajima analysis and find out who is favored!
Dan Added vs Naoki Tajima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Added 1 - 0 Tajima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Added has won 49.51% of points on their second serve, while Tajima has won 46.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Added, in recent form, has won 51.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tajima has won 50.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.16% and 39.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Added has saved 56.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tajima has saved 58.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Added has won 51.43% of matches played (W/L 36/ 34), with Tajima winning 53.33% (W/L 32/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Added has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 92/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Added has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 14/ 21), where as Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Added winning 1 times and Tajima being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Added winning 2 and Tajima winning 0. The last match between Added and Tajima was at the M15 Sibenik, 20-05-2021, Second, Clay with Dan Added getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Added and Tajima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Added winning 0 times and Tajima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Added winning 0, and Tajima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Added has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.44 while Tajima has played against players with an average rank of 90.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Added has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tajima has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Added has converted 44.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tajima has converted 45.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
439
Rank
240
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
57% (265-196)
Career Total W/L
48% (119-130)
45% (14-17)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Dan Added vs Naoki Tajima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Added VS Tajima
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Dan Added | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (33/48) | 51% (29/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (26/33) | 66% (19/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (26/57) | 25% (12/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Dan Added
Player
Naoki Tajima
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dan Added | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (14/17) | 50% (15/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (37/40) | 53% (37/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (337/361) | 52% (333/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 57% (12/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 132 | 86 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 113 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:39 | 1:24:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 245 | 68.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1224/2139) | 58% (894/1549) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (826/1224) | 69% (614/894) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (453/915) | 46% (303/655) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (82/183) | 45% (82/181) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (848/2149) | 43% (700/1620) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (10/12) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 44% (4/5) | 54% (15/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (13/30) | 52% (14/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (5/14) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (17/3) | 14% (14/2) |
Dan Added Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Dan Added
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Santiago Russo
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Dan Added
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
30
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Jonas Forejtek
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Dan Added
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
46%
(
35 of
76)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
92
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Dan Added
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Dan Added
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
6
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sora Fukuda
Player
Naoki Tajima
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Shinji Hazawa
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Issei Okamura
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
6
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kanan Gasimov
Player
Naoki Tajima
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve %
38%
(
6 of
16)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
27
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrin Casanova
Player
Naoki Tajima
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Mubarak Shannan Zayid
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Fedor Sosedkin
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Naoki Tajima
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Added Vs Tajima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Added are available here and Tajima photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dan Added
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Naoki Tajima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
